www.QV500.com - Ford GT40 Part 1: Prototypes |
![]() Chassis GT/101 |
In 1957, the Automobile Manufacturers Association ban on factory-sponsored racing made works involvement by US car builders a back door operation until 1962. However, when the ban was finally lifted, Henry Ford II quickly instigated his Total Performance programme. This saw Ford represented internationally with saloons for circuit and rally use as well as engines being supplied to Lotus for the Indy 500 and Carroll Shelby for the Cobra. Ford wanted to go even further, but as the Total Performance programme was conceptualised principally with the objective of improving Ford’s production models, in this respect, Formula 1 was deemed unsuitable. |
A sports racing project on the other hand would be perfect. The idea of buying Ferrari was seriously considered but eventually came to nothing so rather than starting from scratch, Ford went shopping for another suitable basis on which to start building a GT prototype. Despite failing to finish at the 1963 Le Mans 24 Hours, Eric Broadley’s Lola GT was one of the most advanced cars around. Already powered by a Ford engine, it had shown great potential and soon after Le Mans, Ford bought the Lola, Broadley and his men. They established Ford Advanced Vehicles and built a brand new factory in Slough, England so as to be closer to the hoards of specialist suppliers in the UK and Europe. The design team would be headed by ex-Aston Martin designer, Roy Lunn, whilst Broadley was retained for 1964 and ex-Aston Martin team manager, John Wyer, was put in charge of managing the whole affair. Co-operating closely with Ford’s Dearborn experimental department, the two Lola GT’s were retained as mobile test beds until the end of 1963 when they were retired from active duty and all attention switched over to the new Ford. Appearing in public for the first time in April 1964, the GT40 featured a semi monocoque chassis fabricated by Abbey Panels of Coventry made up almost entirely of spot welded sheet steel supplemented at the front by two square tube stiffeners from the top of the scuttle down to the nose and at the back by a light detachable subframe supporting the rear bodywork. |
|
![]() Chassis GT/101, 1964 Le Mans Trials |
Suspension was via double wishbones at the front, the back utilising double trailing links with a transverse top arm and an inverted A at the bottom. Helical springs with adjustable telescopic dampers were fitted all round. 11.5-inch outboard disc brakes were supplied by Girling and the 15-inch wire wheels by Borrani, these measuring 6.5-inches across at the front and eight at the back. The Borrani’s featured light alloy rims and Rudge centre-locking hubs and were originally shod with Dunlop R6 Racing tyres. A dry sumped 4.2-litre pushrod Ford V8 was installed, this having been a lightweight version of the Fairline engines developed originally for 1963’s Lotus 29 Indy car. |
Displacement was 4183cc thanks to a bore and stroke of 95.5 x 72.9mm respectively, compression being set at 12.5:1. Breathing through four twin choke Weber 48 IDA downdraught carburettors and a special bundle of snakes exhaust system, the GT40 developed 350bhp at 7200rpm and 299lb ft of torque at 5200rpm. Initially a Tipo 37 four-speed Colotti gearbox was used as an interim measure until a suitable five-speed unit could be found, this operating in conjunction with a Borg & Beck triple plate clutch. Glassfibre bodywork was fabricated by Specialised Mouldings of Upper Norwood and painted by Harold Radford in London, but the aerodynamics were highly suspect and the overall package took some time to refine. Standing barely 40-inches high (hence GT40), the hinged front and rear body sections were the subject of extensive development work right up until the production-ready MkI arrived in the summer of 1965. Inside, the side sills contained flexible bag type fuel tanks and a spare wheel was carried in the nose. The fixed seats were also made by Harold Radford and trimmed in lightweight plastic material liberally perforated with circular outlets to help keep the driver cool. Another interesting driver aid was a small inflatable bag in the lumbar region of the rear squab, this allowing the driver to inflate or deflate the seat to relieve muscle fatigue during long stints at the wheel. As the seats were fixed in place, the pedals could be adjusted, all GT40’s (with the exception of four MkIII’s) being completed in right-hand drive with the gearshift positioned to the drivers right. |
|
![]() Chassis GT/102, Nurburgring 1000km |
After an open day for journalists at Slough, the first GT40 was flown to the US in April 1964 where it was displayed at the New York Motor Show. Three cars were built to begin with, one of which was taken to the Le Mans Trials later that month. However, Jo Schlesser got out of shape at 150mph in the wet down the Mulsanne Straight and the car was written off. Another GT40 then showed up for the cars racing debut at the Nurburging 1000km in May but went out after 15 laps. At Le Mans the GT40 led for two hours, set a new lap record and clocked 207mph down the Mulsanne until transmission woes accounted for two of the three cars, the other catching fire. |
Gearbox trouble was a recurring theme at Reims where Attwood and Schlesser’s car ran an experimental 4.7-litre engine, continuing reliability issues at the non-championship Nassau speed week meaning the GT40 ended 1964 with a singular lack of success. By 1965, Eric Broadley had left Ford Advanced Vehicles and re-established his Lola Cars firm after his 12-month consultancy was over. The FAV factory in Slough was still building and experimenting with the GT40 but in order to speed the project up, a decision was made to bring Shelby American into the fold from a development perspective. Shelby embarked upon a series of extensive tests at Riverside and Willow Springs where it became apparent that problems existed with the cooling, gearbox, brakes, weight and high-speed handling. To overcome the temperature problem, the nose was redesigned and all new ducting installed. The engine was reverted to a wet sump set up, thus eliminating the need for the front-mounted oil tank and associated plumbing, saving 75lb and freeing up more space for that improved cooling system. Whereas the original cars were powered by 4.2-litre 255 engines, these were replaced for 1965 by 4.7-litre 289’s as fitted to Shelby’s competition Cobra’s. With a displacement of 4726cc, compression set at 11.5:1 and four Weber 48 IDA carbs, the slightly heavier 289 was reliably producing 385bhp at 7000rpm and also featured loads more torque (312lbs ft at 5000rpm). |
|
![]() Chassis GT/103, 1965 Daytona 24 Hours |
There was additionally an even higher torque version with less peak power for use at events like Sebring and the Targa Florio. Meanwhile, to try and cure the problems with the Colotti transmission, heavy-duty Ford internals were adopted. The original GT40 was equipped with wire wheels to assist in cooling the Girling brakes, however, these had clearly come very close to the limit of their effectiveness. As the wires didn’t really help cooling, Shelby switched the GT40 over to lighter magnesium Halibrand wheels. Much wider rims were fitted (eight and 9.5-inches wide front/rear up from 6.5 and eight respectively) necessitating more bulbous rear bodywork. |
Brake lines and ducting were improved and the inflatable drivers seat discarded. There were two principal teams running GT40’s in 1965, Shelby American in California with their blue and white striped cars and FAV in Slough with their pale green machines. Additionally, an early production MkI went to Ford France while Shelby enlisted the help of Rob Walker and Scuderia Filipinetti for the Le Mans 24 Hour race. Some cars used alloy wheels, some had wires and their were different tyres too in an attempt to find the perfect combination. Results were immediate, Shelby’s blue and white cars winning at Daytona, coming second at Sebring and third at Monza. At the Targa Florio, the first of two GT40 Roadster’s was run by FAV, this body style featuring a flattened rear deck and basket-style roll hoop. No-one quite seemed to know whose idea the Roadster was as the only place the drivers preferred such a car was at the Targa because elsewhere they wouldn’t want to give away the aerodynamic advantages of the coupe version. Furthermore, the Roadster didn’t save much weight as the absence of a stressed roof meant the chassis had to be beefed up to maintain rigidity. The next race was the Nurburgring 1000km and was notable for the arrival of a MkI production GT40 whilst one of Shelby’s entries tried an experimental 5.3-litre engine. |
|
![]() Chassis GT/111, 1965 Targa Florio |
At Le Mans, Shelby turned up with two GT40’s fitted with seven-litre Ford Galaxie engines, but while very fast, they were also very heavy on fuel and destroyed themselves early in the race. Despite none of the GT40’s finishing at Le Mans it had still been a fairly good year and things were shaping up nicely for 1966. New rules were being introduced that split GT racing into three categories, one for one-off prototypes, one for cars of which at least 50 must have been built in 12 consecutive months and one for cars of which at least 1000 must have been built in 12 consecutive months. Ford wanted to contest both the one off prototype category (with a seven-litre GT40) and also the second group with its production requirement of 50 cars (Group 4). To qualify, they put the 4.7-litre GT40 into limited production and planned to build the 50 cars by the end of 1965. Some of the prototypes were sold on to the likes of Bill Wonder and Peter Sutcliffe and in many cases these were brought up to MkI specification. |
| Date | Race | Drivers | Entrant | Chassis |
# |
Qual |
Pos |
CP |
Class |
| 31/05/1964 | Nurburgring 1000km | Hill McLaren |
Ford Advanced Vehicles | 102 |
140 |
2nd |
DNF |
- |
PGT 3.0+ |
| 21-22/06/1964 | Le Mans 24 Hours | Hill McLaren Salvadori |
Ford Motor Co. | 102 |
10 |
4th |
DNF |
- |
PGT 3.0+ |
| Ginther Gregory |
Ford Motor Co. | 103 |
11 |
2nd |
DNF |
- |
PGT 3.0+ | ||
| Attwood Schlesser |
Ford Motor Co. | 104 |
12 |
9th |
DNF |
- |
PGT 3.0+ | ||
| 05/07/1964 | Reims 12 Hours | McLaren Hill |
Ford Motor Co. | 102 |
4 |
? |
DNF |
- |
PGT 3.0+ |
| Attwood Schlesser |
Ford Motor Co. | 105 |
6 |
? |
DNF |
- |
PGT 3.0+ | ||
| Ginther Gregory |
Ford Motor Co. | 103 |
5 |
? |
DNF |
- |
PGT 3.0+ | ||
| 28/02/1965 | Daytona 2000km | Miles Ruby |
Shelby American Inc. | 103 |
73 |
3rd |
1st |
1st |
PGT |
| Bondurant Ginther |
Shelby American Inc. | 104 |
72 |
2nd |
3rd |
2nd |
PGT | ||
| 27/03/1965 | Sebring 12 Hours | Miles McLaren |
Shelby American Inc. | 103 |
11 |
3rd |
2nd |
1st |
PGT |
| Ginther Hill |
Shelby American Inc. | 104 |
10 |
4th |
DNF |
- |
PGT | ||
| 25/04/1965 | Monza 1000km | Miles McLaren |
Shelby American Inc. | 103 |
69 |
5th |
3rd |
3rd |
PGT |
| Amon Magliogli |
Shelby American Inc. | 104 |
68 |
8th |
NC |
- |
PGT | ||
| 09/05/1965 | Targa Florio | Bondurant Whitmore |
Ford Advanced Vehicles | 111 Roadster |
194 |
NA |
NC |
- |
PGT |
| 23/05/1965 | Nurburgring 1000km | Amon McLaren Hill Bucknum |
Shelby American Inc. | 104 |
11 |
5th |
8th |
3rd |
PGT |
| Attwood Whitmore |
Ford Advanced Vehicles | 112 Roadster |
10 |
6th |
DNF |
- |
PGT | ||
| Hill McLaren |
Shelby American Inc. | 103 |
12 |
4th |
DNF |
- |
PGT | ||
| 19-20/06/1965 | Le Mans 24 Hours | Amon Hill |
Shelby American Inc. | 107 7.0 |
2 |
1st |
DNF |
- |
PGT 5.0+ |
| McLaren Miles |
Shelby American Inc. | 106 7.0 |
1 |
4th |
DNF |
- |
PGT 5.0+ | ||
| Trintignant Ligier |
Ford France | 109 Roadster |
15 |
13th |
DNF |
- |
PGT 5.0 | ||
| 5-6/02/1966 | Daytona 24 Hours | Sutcliffe Grossman |
Ford Advanced Vehicles | 105 |
86 |
19th |
14th |
1st |
S 3.0+ |






